<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GPL Showdown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digwp.com/2010/07/gpl-showdown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digwp.com/2010/07/gpl-showdown/</link>
	<description>Take your WordPress skills to the next level.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:52:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: thinkdj</title>
		<link>http://digwp.com/2010/07/gpl-showdown/#comment-7785</link>
		<dc:creator>thinkdj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digwp.com/?p=2538#comment-7785</guid>
		<description>Agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Montana Flynn</title>
		<link>http://digwp.com/2010/07/gpl-showdown/#comment-6912</link>
		<dc:creator>Montana Flynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 00:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digwp.com/?p=2538#comment-6912</guid>
		<description>My thoughts as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My thoughts as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Starr</title>
		<link>http://digwp.com/2010/07/gpl-showdown/#comment-6899</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Starr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digwp.com/?p=2538#comment-6899</guid>
		<description>Looks like Chris Pearson changed his mind rather quickly:

http://bit.ly/acpdmR

I wonder who will be next on the &quot;go GPL or we&#039;ll sue&quot; hitlist..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Chris Pearson changed his mind rather quickly:</p>
<p><a href="http://bit.ly/acpdmR" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/acpdmR</a></p>
<p>I wonder who will be next on the &#8220;go GPL or we&#8217;ll sue&#8221; hitlist..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris</title>
		<link>http://digwp.com/2010/07/gpl-showdown/#comment-6852</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 08:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digwp.com/?p=2538#comment-6852</guid>
		<description>Thanks KB,

I think the part about not re-releasing the code built on top of WP is the part that I was missing here.  It&#039;s one thing to buy a solution, have the source code (assuming it&#039;s provided) and be a developer who can modify and improve it.  If those improvements or fixes (via the support community) make it back into the product and profits of somebody else, I can see how that would cause some unrest.

Thanks for the info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks KB,</p>
<p>I think the part about not re-releasing the code built on top of WP is the part that I was missing here.  It&#8217;s one thing to buy a solution, have the source code (assuming it&#8217;s provided) and be a developer who can modify and improve it.  If those improvements or fixes (via the support community) make it back into the product and profits of somebody else, I can see how that would cause some unrest.</p>
<p>Thanks for the info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://digwp.com/2010/07/gpl-showdown/#comment-6844</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digwp.com/?p=2538#comment-6844</guid>
		<description>@KB: I&#039;d be willing to bet that if you&#039;re using specific WordPress hooks (i.e. bloginfo, the_content, etc) that it would fall under a derivative work because those hooks are specific to WordPress (and not generic php functions), but that&#039;s neither here nor there...

The main point I wanted to make with regards to your comment is that, as has been pointed out elsewhere, several WP developers &lt;em&gt;have&lt;/em&gt; determined that code was deliberately copy/pasted from WordPress core into Thesis, see Andrew Nacin&#039;s post here:
http://www.andrewnacin.com/2010/07/15/thesis-gpl/

Additionally, Mike Wasylik, the lawyer who first proposed that fair use might apply, has said that in light of that fact, fair use &lt;em&gt;probably wouldn&#039;t&lt;/em&gt; apply.
http://www.davidglarson.com/web-design/is-thesis-for-wordpress-legal-almost-certainly/#comment-67

The code, as I understand it, was added around version 1.5, so all subsequent versions up to and including 1.8-beta would technically fall under the GPL because they include GPL code.  The question then becomes, if Chris rips that code out, is that safe to use a non-GPL license?  Or does 1.8 (minus the WP &quot;copy pasta&quot;) become a &lt;em&gt;derivative&lt;/em&gt; of the previous, GPL versions unless he completely rewrites &lt;em&gt;everything&lt;/em&gt;?

The whole issue is clearly outside the range of what casual observers could really gauge at this point, especially considering legal experts can&#039;t even agree on the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@KB: I&#8217;d be willing to bet that if you&#8217;re using specific WordPress hooks (i.e. bloginfo, the_content, etc) that it would fall under a derivative work because those hooks are specific to WordPress (and not generic php functions), but that&#8217;s neither here nor there&#8230;</p>
<p>The main point I wanted to make with regards to your comment is that, as has been pointed out elsewhere, several WP developers <em>have</em> determined that code was deliberately copy/pasted from WordPress core into Thesis, see Andrew Nacin&#8217;s post here:<br />
<a href="http://www.andrewnacin.com/2010/07/15/thesis-gpl/" rel="nofollow">http://www.andrewnacin.com/2010/07/15/thesis-gpl/</a></p>
<p>Additionally, Mike Wasylik, the lawyer who first proposed that fair use might apply, has said that in light of that fact, fair use <em>probably wouldn&#8217;t</em> apply.<br />
<a href="http://www.davidglarson.com/web-design/is-thesis-for-wordpress-legal-almost-certainly/#comment-67" rel="nofollow">http://www.davidglarson.com/web-design/is-thesis-for-wordpress-legal-almost-certainly/#comment-67</a></p>
<p>The code, as I understand it, was added around version 1.5, so all subsequent versions up to and including 1.8-beta would technically fall under the GPL because they include GPL code.  The question then becomes, if Chris rips that code out, is that safe to use a non-GPL license?  Or does 1.8 (minus the WP &#8220;copy pasta&#8221;) become a <em>derivative</em> of the previous, GPL versions unless he completely rewrites <em>everything</em>?</p>
<p>The whole issue is clearly outside the range of what casual observers could really gauge at this point, especially considering legal experts can&#8217;t even agree on the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KB</title>
		<link>http://digwp.com/2010/07/gpl-showdown/#comment-6842</link>
		<dc:creator>KB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 00:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digwp.com/?p=2538#comment-6842</guid>
		<description>Kris,
It&#039;s not necessarily viewed as a threat, but it&#039;s diluting the spirit of the GPL, the license under which WP is released which states that any derivative software must also be released under GPL or compatible license.

Since I have not seen the code of Thesis, I cannot comment on whether or not it is violating the GPL license, but many people seem to think it does, including Matt Mullenweg. Right now, Chris allegedly has a stringent license which prohibits most of that. (I say allegedly because I have not read his license.)

The goal is to have Chris Pearson release Thesis re-licensed to be compatible with the GPL which will basically give the people who purchase the theme the right to modify it and release it however they see fit (i.e. they can rewrite his code and release it for free or sell it, whatever floats their boats, so long as they release it under GPL, too). 

Or, he can find a way to dual license it, which may be more trouble than it&#039;s worth, so that the part which uses WP code is GPL and his custom bits are licensed however he wishes...but I think Matt would just be happy if the whole shebang were released as GPL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kris,<br />
It&#8217;s not necessarily viewed as a threat, but it&#8217;s diluting the spirit of the GPL, the license under which WP is released which states that any derivative software must also be released under GPL or compatible license.</p>
<p>Since I have not seen the code of Thesis, I cannot comment on whether or not it is violating the GPL license, but many people seem to think it does, including Matt Mullenweg. Right now, Chris allegedly has a stringent license which prohibits most of that. (I say allegedly because I have not read his license.)</p>
<p>The goal is to have Chris Pearson release Thesis re-licensed to be compatible with the GPL which will basically give the people who purchase the theme the right to modify it and release it however they see fit (i.e. they can rewrite his code and release it for free or sell it, whatever floats their boats, so long as they release it under GPL, too). </p>
<p>Or, he can find a way to dual license it, which may be more trouble than it&#8217;s worth, so that the part which uses WP code is GPL and his custom bits are licensed however he wishes&#8230;but I think Matt would just be happy if the whole shebang were released as GPL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KB</title>
		<link>http://digwp.com/2010/07/gpl-showdown/#comment-6841</link>
		<dc:creator>KB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digwp.com/?p=2538#comment-6841</guid>
		<description>It could also be said that using the custom filters/functions provided by WordPress (i.e. in the Codex) also doesn&#039;t constitute a &quot;derivative work.&quot; It&#039;s like using an API to plug into a software program, but it doesn&#039;t necessarily alter the function of or branch out the software and it wouldn&#039;t be &lt;em&gt;new&lt;/em&gt; software &lt;em&gt;derived&lt;/em&gt; from the old software. 

If that were the case, then many many PHP programs out there which use a generic function from or use the include()/require() functions to call a GPL&#039;ed file would therefore fall under some variation of the GPL, which is just plain silly.

What it comes down to is the ambiguous line between derivative and dependent; they are &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; the same thing.

And I know many people are bellyaching about going to court, but I want it to go there. I want a legal precendent to be set. But, in this specific case, unless it can be proven that Pearson is using code copy/pasted directly from the WordPress software &lt;em&gt;outside of Fair Use&lt;/em&gt;, there&#039;s a good chance WP could lose this one. 

It&#039;s better, and easier, in this case simply to ostracize Pearson/Thesis and form a rally of people (i.e. the diehard WP community) to stone him because one of a few things will happen: his business will ultimately be damaged and he&#039;ll be forced to release under GPL, close up shop, or just live with the losses. I think Matt knows this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could also be said that using the custom filters/functions provided by WordPress (i.e. in the Codex) also doesn&#8217;t constitute a &#8220;derivative work.&#8221; It&#8217;s like using an API to plug into a software program, but it doesn&#8217;t necessarily alter the function of or branch out the software and it wouldn&#8217;t be <em>new</em> software <em>derived</em> from the old software. </p>
<p>If that were the case, then many many PHP programs out there which use a generic function from or use the include()/require() functions to call a GPL&#8217;ed file would therefore fall under some variation of the GPL, which is just plain silly.</p>
<p>What it comes down to is the ambiguous line between derivative and dependent; they are <em>not</em> the same thing.</p>
<p>And I know many people are bellyaching about going to court, but I want it to go there. I want a legal precendent to be set. But, in this specific case, unless it can be proven that Pearson is using code copy/pasted directly from the WordPress software <em>outside of Fair Use</em>, there&#8217;s a good chance WP could lose this one. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s better, and easier, in this case simply to ostracize Pearson/Thesis and form a rally of people (i.e. the diehard WP community) to stone him because one of a few things will happen: his business will ultimately be damaged and he&#8217;ll be forced to release under GPL, close up shop, or just live with the losses. I think Matt knows this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://digwp.com/2010/07/gpl-showdown/#comment-6788</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digwp.com/?p=2538#comment-6788</guid>
		<description>Lucid, reasonable and impartial. And the use of the emoticon shows a person of enormous class and standing.

It&#039;s the cancer that&#039;s the parasite or his the human that&#039;s the parasite of the cancer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucid, reasonable and impartial. And the use of the emoticon shows a person of enormous class and standing.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the cancer that&#8217;s the parasite or his the human that&#8217;s the parasite of the cancer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris</title>
		<link>http://digwp.com/2010/07/gpl-showdown/#comment-6778</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 03:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digwp.com/?p=2538#comment-6778</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have much experience with Thesis or what it does, but I&#039;m about to go find out more just from this post and the comments.

Can anybody briefly sum up what type of threat WordPress views Thesis as?

Thanks in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have much experience with Thesis or what it does, but I&#8217;m about to go find out more just from this post and the comments.</p>
<p>Can anybody briefly sum up what type of threat WordPress views Thesis as?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hoff</title>
		<link>http://digwp.com/2010/07/gpl-showdown/#comment-6774</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 22:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digwp.com/?p=2538#comment-6774</guid>
		<description>You can read what WordPress has to say about domains and graphics and all that stuff &lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/about/domains/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;right here&lt;/a&gt;.

The way I see it, Matt and his crew built something that we have all been able to ride along with and make lots, and I mean, lots of money. 

It&#039;s only fair to listen to what few things he asks us to refrain from doing. Like Jeff said, if Matt asked me to do something, I&#039;d probably do it. Our company has an excellent target customer base thanks to him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can read what WordPress has to say about domains and graphics and all that stuff <a href="http://wordpress.org/about/domains/" rel="nofollow">right here</a>.</p>
<p>The way I see it, Matt and his crew built something that we have all been able to ride along with and make lots, and I mean, lots of money. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s only fair to listen to what few things he asks us to refrain from doing. Like Jeff said, if Matt asked me to do something, I&#8217;d probably do it. Our company has an excellent target customer base thanks to him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

